← All transcripts

Choosing Your Sales Strategy: Lighthouse vs. Landgrab Transcript, AI Summary & Key Points

a16z · 2 days ago · Science & Technology · 43:56 · EN

🧠 AI Summary

Enterprise AI startups generally choose between a lighthouse strategy and a land grab strategy. Lighthouse sales target high-exposure markets where buyers need social proof, education, regulation, and trusted reference customers; land grab sales target existing workflows and budgets where the business case can be demonstrated through math. The right choice depends on buyer exposure, whether proof travels across the market, whether the product replaces an existing solution, and whether customers are willing to buy and use it. Companies can begin with one strategy and later adopt both as they mature. Founders should spend about 1% of their time on go-to-market strategy and 99% executing by speaking with customers, pursuing the earliest viable sales, and reassessing as the company develops.

🔑 Key Points

  • The lighthouse framework maps markets by buyer exposure and whether proof travels; high exposure and highly portable proof favor lighthouse sales, while low exposure and limited proof portability favor land grabs.
  • Lighthouse markets often involve regulated industries, fewer potential logos, new categories, and purchases with significant consequences if the buyer chooses incorrectly.
  • Land grab markets usually have established budgets and existing workflows, allowing startups to show that their solution is better than a software-based or human-based alternative.
  • Samsara benefited from the ELD mandate, which required transportation companies to adopt electronic logging devices between 2016 and 2019 and created a broad market with new budget.
  • Samsara initially targeted mid-market customers because they required less social proof, had shorter sales cycles, deployed faster, and provided quicker product feedback.
  • A deal's ACV should clear the unit-economic hurdle; after that, the focus should be on acquiring as many viable deals as possible and gradually moving up the ACV ladder.
  • Companies can shift strategies as they mature: Meraki and Samsara began with land grabs and later used lighthouse strategies when entering verticals such as public sector.
  • The biggest early-stage mistake is analysis paralysis. Founders should talk to customers, pursue the customers willing to buy the current product, and continually improve and reassess.

✅ Actionable items

  • Evaluate a market using buyer exposure and whether proof travels across the market.
  • Check whether buyers have an existing budget and whether the product replaces an established workflow or vendor.
  • Talk to customers and pursue the earliest and easiest sales rather than deciding the entire go-to-market strategy in isolation.
  • Set an ACV threshold based on unit economics, reject deals below the threshold, and build a repeatable engine around viable deals.
  • For trials and POCs, define the scope, success criteria, and a firm end date in advance.
  • Match trial length to product complexity; examples given were 30-day, 45-day, and 60-day trials.
  • Use more seasoned enterprise sellers for lighthouse strategies and prioritize aggressive, attitude-and-aptitude-oriented sellers for land grabs.
  • Consider hiring sales operations or revenue operations early to manage territory alignment, name lists, commission administration, and sales processes.
  • Set reasonable early sales quotas that give sellers a realistic chance to succeed while preserving healthy unit economics.

💡 Business ideas

Lighthouse enterprise AI software for regulated or high-exposure markets00:07

Build a new AI category or high-risk workflow product by winning a small number of influential customers whose adoption provides social proof that travels through the market. This fits markets where buyers face significant exposure from choosing the wrong solution, where regulation matters, where the number of potential logos is constrained, or where customers need substantial education before purchasing.

For
Large, influential organizations in regulated or high-risk industries, such as major law firms, insurance companies, financial institutions, public-sector organizations, or other buyers whose adoption can influence similar organizations.
Solves
Buyers need confidence that a new, consequential AI product is safe, effective, governed, and suitable for their industry before they will adopt it.
  • Harvey won several critical law-firm accounts for AI capabilities that augment legal work and automate tasks performed by junior lawyers; the transcript says the resulting proof traveled strongly and made the solution safer for other high-exposure buyers.
Soon you can unlock the full business plan.

Behind this: 12 build steps · how to validate demand · 3 more real examples · 5 things the video never answers.

Inquire for details

Soon you can unlock the full business plan.

Inquire for details

Land-grab AI software that replaces an existing workflow with measurable ROI00:37

Build and sell AI software into a broad market where customers already spend money on an established product, service, or human workflow. Win customers by demonstrating better economics or performance rather than relying primarily on marquee logos, then create a repeatable sales engine and expand toward larger accounts and verticals.

For
Mid-market and other organizations with an established budget for the workflow being replaced or improved, including businesses that already pay vendors or employees to perform the relevant work.
Solves
Organizations spend too much money or time on an existing workflow and need a demonstrably better, faster, simpler, or more effective replacement.
  • Samsara used a land-grab opportunity around the US ELD mandate, which required transportation companies to adopt electronic logging devices. The mandate created budget across the industry, and Samsara initially focused on mid-market customers to reduce the need for social proof and obtain fast product feedback.
Soon you can unlock the full business plan.

Behind this: 13 build steps · how to validate demand · 3 more real examples · 6 things the video never answers.

Inquire for details

Soon you can unlock the full business plan.

Inquire for details

🧰 Tools & AI usage

AI is used for

  • Automating accounts receivable collections — AI can conduct conversations, use internal information, and perform the collections process alongside humans, with the claimed potential to improve working capital, save money, and make money.14:38
  • Customer support — AI is used to provide customer support with explicit performance benchmarks.25:21
  • Insurance workflows — AI is introduced into insurance in a governance-first and secure form, supported by forward-deployed teams.26:00
  • Replacing repetitive work — AI agents are presented as a way for companies to reduce mundane repetitive work and enable humans to perform higher-value activities.33:50

📄 Transcript

Searchable transcript of Choosing Your Sales Strategy: Lighthouse vs. Landgrab — a16z (43:56). Search for a phrase, then click its timestamp to jump straight to that moment in the video.

Captions sourced from the original video on YouTube, published by a16z. The video, its captions and all related intellectual property remain the property of their respective owners; AINotes claims no ownership. Provided for research, accessibility and search — see the Transcript Notice and Copyright Policy.

00:00 There's a moment right now to go sell big software again. We're now looking at a different way of doing business entirely. >> What are the lighthouse and land grab sales playbooks? >> Here's the framework for evaluating which playbook should you be following. There's this very obvious one. Go after the very obvious companies here in San Francisco that probably have some sort of proof or social value associated with them.

00:17 Or like go out and sell in Ohio, find people who need your solution. If you think about sort of the enterprise networking world in 2009, people thought we were crazy. Like we had no chance of getting into the largest corporations in the world, Lighthouse, because Cisco and HP had them all tied up. But what we could do is we could say, listen, we can configure, we can deploy faster, we're simpler to use.

00:37 And that was very much a land grab strategy. Too few people are willing to pick up the phone and willing to get on the plane and willing to get, you know, in front of those customers right now because they feel like it sounds way more sexy to sell [music] to JP Morgan Chase than to Morgan Chase. [laughter] I think the biggest mistake that I see [music] founders make at an early stage, honestly, is just >> Welcome back to the A6Z podcast.

00:58 Today, we're getting into the single most expensive question an AI founder makes, how you sell. Joe Schmidt just wrote a piece called Lighthouse or Land Grab, which gets into the two dominant playbooks he's observed among enterprise AI startups. Joe, tell us about the piece in your own words. What are the Lighthouse and Land Grab sales playbooks? Yeah.

01:20 And and this this piece actually all stemmed back from an observation uh that I had actually driving up the 101 freeway. Uh maybe this is like three, four, five months ago. I can't remember. And you just realize that you have the same kind of like two competing companies like one's on one side of the freeway and the other's on the other side of the freeway and they're selling the exact same piece of software.

01:38 And for some reason they all have decided that the only relevant companies for this piece of software are in San Francisco and driving on the 101 freeway. And then this has gotten even more ridiculous. It's obviously every bus has been wrapped and every you know it's like planes are flying up above and they're now towing you know towing startups and so I think it's it's all very clever but it's all targeting the same kind of sales motion reality is >> you don't always have to do that like you don't always have to sell

02:02 to the same companies in San Francisco and so what I wanted to try to do is tell founders like hey here's the framework for evaluating which playbook should you be following there's this very obvious one which is like go after the very obvious companies here in San Francisco in New York City in a major metro that probably have some sort of proof or social value associated with them or like go out and sell in Ohio, go out and sell in Chicago, go out and sell in St.

02:26 Louis, find people who who need your solution. Um, and so that was the whole point of the piece is like you don't always have to go sell these notable logos. And um, we'll see how that plays out, but that's why. And and just to get a little bit deeper, like when does it make sense for a a founder to, you know, go and buy a giant billboard that you see when you're driving from SFO into the city?

02:48 When does it make sense for you to kind of do a more targeted sales activity or like motion elsewhere? >> Yeah. And I think the way that we tried to make this make sense, of course, we did very uh consulting style with a 2x2 matrix. Um I did never work at a consulting firm but um I'll do my best. Uh and so we really were thinking about okay what are the the axes that we should be kind of mapping opportunities against.

03:10 And so we decided upon like the y-axis is really what we called like a the buyer's exposure. Um and it's intentionally called exposure because there's the exposure of you know making a mistake with the solution that you buy. There's also the sol the exposure of the solution inside of your company like does this does this product that I'm selling to my customer end up you know being sh is it shown to their end customers right which is actually an important distinction um and really just kind of the overall risk

03:34 associated with buying this piece of software so that was like kind of the y- axis and it goes from like high to low um and then the the x-axis is whether or not proof travels in any given market and so you know if you think about like the top right would be proof travels in this market um and it's it's high buyer exposure ure and high, you know, high buyer risk.

03:52 Um, and the bottom left would and and that's a lighthouse market, right? Just to be clear. Um, and the bottom left would be, you know, low low, uh, you know, low proof traveling, but also low buyer exposure. Uh, and that would be a land grab market. Um, and so I think those are actually quite different. And if you think about the the, you know, the standard markets that fit into the lighthouse model, it's, you know, regulated industries.

04:12 Oftent times there's a a more constricted number of logos. Um, if you're wrong in the industry, like if the buyer buys the wrong piece of software and it ends up doing the wrong thing, uh, it can lead to of, you know, very bad things happening for your firm, uh, including, you know, potentially getting in trouble with the regulator, you know, even going, uh, and doing something illegal.

04:32 That's very bad. Uh, of course. Um, and then, uh, you know, on the flip side, when you, uh, when you're looking at the more of a land grab market, there's an established budget. People have been very, you know, used to and accustomed to paying for a type of service. and you can kind of come in there and show like the end buyer the math of like hey my solution is better than whatever solution you're you're using today whether that's you know a software driven solution or a human driven solution.

04:54 So you know the the the kind of distinction that we drew was between like proof on the the top right of the of the of the quadrant and math on the bottom left of the of the quadrant. Um and that's how we kind of thought about the framework. >> Yeah. And Andy, we'll get into your background uh in a little bit, but I think first maybe it's it's good to kind of categorize some of these modernday AI startups within these two frameworks.

05:17 And I know you both work with a lot of these companies. So, so Joe, I'm not sure if you want to call out specific examples or Andy, if you want to call out specific examples and really just kind of like talk through the the sales strategies that you're seeing. Yeah. I mean, well, you're like, you know, the the the land grab uh you know, mastermind. So, maybe you want to talk about some of the stuff that you've seen.

05:36 >> Yeah. Well, I I think you you framed it up really well in in your in your article, but um you I think that concept of like the the lighthouse being more in industries that require, you know, regulation, a lot of social proof and so forth. And those tend to be companies that are going after like a category creation, right? It it doesn't exist today.

05:53 So, therefore, you got to go out and you got to kind of prove yourself with the big the big names. And obviously we have a bunch of portfolio companies out there. There's a there's a bunch of companies I think you mentioned a couple in your article that are doing that. And then on the other side the the the sort of land grab uh you know less social proof but those tend to be especially in the AI world today.

06:08 Those are companies that are maybe replacing or improving workflows that already exist and there's existing budget and again we have a whole bunch of portfolio companies you named a couple in the article um that are doing that today. They're inserting themselves in saying hey we built a better way to go after this through AI. Uh and and I think those are the great, you know, companies going after the land grab strategy.

06:29 >> Yeah. And and it's interesting. I mean, um for for those that aren't aren't familiar with with Andy's background, you know, he's uh he's built some of the the the best sales organizations that I've ever heard of at Samsara and Moroi. Um and I've always found like these these stories like really fascinating, illuminating like the the Samsara, you know, story around kind of the ELD mandate is the way I understand it.

06:48 um kind of basically forcing a category to happen everywhere all at one point and it's just who can go out there and do it fastest. Like maybe just if you if you could for for the audience's edification like share a little bit about what that like big why now moment was because we're kind of having one right now um and and how you guys kind of went and captured it.

07:08 >> Yeah. Yeah. I think if you uh if you're in the industry uh for long enough and I've got the gray hair to prove that I have been blonde [laughter] blonde blonde. Yeah. Bordering on gray. Sure. um you know you you tend to see these big you know transitions and and I'm old enough to have seen you know the the internet come about and uh you know certainly mobile and cloud and obviously now AI and each each of those causes this this transition and it and it causes new ways to think about how you go to market >> um not

07:35 wholesale changes but always tools to help improve upon them um and and I think uh you know the other thing I would say um I I can't name too many companies that have become hugely successful without some element of timing and luck, >> right? And so you talk about Samsara and um you know the company was founded back in 2015, I joined in 2017. Um and you know the idea back then was you know at the very beginning it was like internet connected sensors like all the value chains are going to become sensored up.

08:04 How do we you know get sensors out there ingest this data give it back to business owners in in digestible and usable ways. Um, and one of the first products that started gaining traction were these telematics units. And, uh, you know, taking a step back, if you think about, you know, the the world of transportation, long haul trucking, right? Um, you know, prior to like 2016, uh, they had these manual log books.

08:25 If you were driving a truck and you stopped to take a break, you would write down in your log book, I had just drove for four hours, now I'm taking a 20-minut break. And then you drove for two more hours and you stopped for lunch. And if you got pulled over by highway patrol, they would ask to see your log book and they'd audit and make sure you weren't driving too long.

08:43 It was it was a safety regulation. And in the US round about 2016, they implemented this ELD mandate, right? Stand stood for electronic logging devices. And the idea there was, hey, we can use technology to actually track when the vehicle's moving and when it isn't, and are they taking enough breaks and so forth, right? Take the human uh and and and data element out of it.

09:04 Um the human element, rather. And and so, you know, over a 2-year period, that was basically implemented between 2016 and 2019 with various phases of of sort of compliance. But what it did is it it provided this huge tailwind for anybody making these electronic logging devices. And we just happened to be one of the newer companies doing it. >> And there were some very very established players, right?

09:25 AT&T had a solution. Verizon had a solution. There were a number of companies that were in sort of the, you know, hundreds of millions, half a billion in revenue already doing this. >> And, you know, rising tide floats all boats. It helped everybody. But if you were a new entrant into the market like we were at Sanssara, it really helped because basically the entire industry all of a sudden had to find budget to go out and and buy these things.

09:47 And a certain percentage of them, you know, clearly would say, "Hey, let's check out what's new out there. Any new entrance into the field?" And so it really helped kind of, you know, give us a a boost. >> How did you navigate like the the social proof side of that? cuz like uh you know I think uh the casual observer might think about that and say okay wow this is regulated like we can't screw this up so you probably have to go win I don't know what the largest long haul trucking company is I'm trying to think of the

10:12 ones I see on the freeway but in any event you probably have to go win that one but it doesn't sound like that's what you did from what I understand that's not what you had to do so how' you navigate that social proof element >> yeah well I I think um you know I I would and maybe I'm doing a little bit disservice to to to uh the amount of strategy that went into this but there wasn't a lot of strategy that went into like do we chase lighthouse accounts or do we go after land grant >> who's willing to pay us?

10:34 >> We kind of listen to our customers, right? And and it doesn't take too many cold calls into the largest trucking and transportation firms when you're a, you know, 18month old company. Yeah. Uh that they've never heard of to hear we're not buying you click to figure out, hey, you know, who can we sell to? Yeah. And you know, in in 2017, 2018, you know, we had minimal features, right?

10:54 We were just looking for do we have >> something that somebody wants to buy? And so for us at that point in time, the mid-market was the place to go >> for a couple reasons. Number one, uh it didn't require as much social proof, right? Uh it was it was more about, hey, are you satisfying my my need for for telematics? Uh do you do you fit the requirement?

11:13 Um and then, you know, the other reason was we could get really fast feedback on the product, right? Because the sales cycles were short. We could get it implemented quickly. They would deploy quickly, right? The bigger the account, the longer these deployments, the longer the feedback loops. And so it really helped us with the the sort of product innovation side as well just to get as many deals out there, get as many wins as we could.

11:34 >> Yeah. And I think this is actually really important though like as like you know early stage founders evaluate this moment in time like what we don't exactly have like you know the mandate from the you know US government saying you have to adopt AI but like you know CEOs everywhere are saying you do have to adopt AI company. I think there are AI boards at every enterprise right now saying like here's what we need to buy and we need to do it by X period of time and and that surely will go away but there is this

11:58 moment of like crazy you know kinetic energy inside of big companies and and so I think that like what he just said actually what Andy just said is is actually a good a good kind of bother of whether or not you're in a land grab versus a lighthouse market. Are people willing to actually buy from you is part of the land grab uh you know math here is like are they willing to get on the phone with you?

12:17 Are they willing to buy your product? are you going through PC's and are you figuring out like how to get someone to use it, you know, and so if you can't get that done, then it's all about going and like doing like very deep, you know, forward deployed uh Lighthouse like, you know, arrangements and figuring out how to then get to your next customers.

12:32 But um I just think too like too few people are willing to pick up the phone and willing to get on the plane and and willing to get, you know, in front of those customers right now because they feel like, oh, this is like this new category moment. I have to go I have to go to JP Morgan Chase to to sell my deal. Yeah. >> And you said a really good thing there.

12:49 It's it's, you know, do they have existing budget? Do they have, you know, is it is it a replacement product? If it is, then you're probably going to lean more towards a land grab. Yeah. >> If this is a brand new product and and there's so many of those today, right? We talk to founders every day. Companies are being born with brand new products and they're going after brand new markets.

13:06 If you have to do a lot of education to your market, if they don't have existing budget, if you're gonna have to take them through this educational journey before they can go out and justify the purchase internally, that's probably more of a lighthouse strategy, right? You're taking them on this educational journey and it's a lot more missionary work than it is, hey, take that money that you're spending with vendor A and move it over to us.

13:26 >> Yeah. Yeah. >> So, maybe it's worth getting specific about some of these companies. I know in the piece you talk about Heavia and Harvey as as classic lighthouse examples and then Stut and Deagon as as land grab. So maybe do you guys want to talk about some of those those playbooks that you've seen or maybe like give other examples? >> Yeah, sure.

13:45 I mean I I can go and you jump in. Um you know uh so for example I highlight STO in the article as like the the prototypical example of uh of a land grab company that we're seeing in this new age. And so uh Stuart this amazing business founded by you know two incredible entrepreneurs um Tark and Ben and um what they are going after is the accounts receivable market and for listeners uh who maybe have never thought about like AR accounts receivable basically you know this is when someone owes you money you know in

14:13 enterprise context and you have to go collect the money from them this is not glamorous um but however there has been you know a mechanism to do this historically right there are collections teams and there's big pieces of software like um you know I won't say their names because the compliance will probably bleed them out anyway. So there are big companies that do lots of ARR that uh that sell on this market, but it's been very manual, right?

14:31 These these human teams have to interact with this piece of software and they have to go out there and they have to sell um or have to go they have to go collect. And so what Stu said was, hey, AI is actually quite good at, you know, basically having conversations with with people. It's very good at looking at information internally and basically doing this process end to end.

14:45 And so we could reimagine this historic, you know, way of doing collections. And instead of having humans do it, we can have humans plus AI do this um and and do it even more effectively. And that what that they then saw that open up was like the rest of kind of like you know order to cash and basically the entire kind of accounts receivable suite. Um and so what they basically went out and showed uh all of their early stage buyers was in doing this we have the math to prove it.

15:09 We will be more effective than your current solution and your current human teams at collecting and this will do XYZ for you know it'll improve working capital by a tremendous amount. Um it'll save you money. It'll actually make you more money. Um, so they were able to go out to the mid-market and just basically show the math and be like, "Would you like to, you know, have this solution?"

15:27 Yes or no. Um, so that's a really good example of a of a of a land grab market. Um, and those entrepreneurs are just like unbelievable sellers. They hit the pavement better than anyone. Um, just as good as anyone as anyone I've ever seen. Um, and uh, and and they're doing a great job. You know, another example on on the Lighthouse side would be, you know, we we highlight Harvey in our article.

15:45 Um, and they just did a fantastic job of winning the right law firms for this very new, very, you know, theoretically high-risk initiative where you're augmenting your human workforce with, you know, a AI capabilities and really automating what, you know, um, you know, junior lawyers would be doing um, on a day-to-day basis. And so when they won the first kind of, you know, few critical lighthouse accounts um, inside of their market, like that proof traveled like big time.

16:11 Um and uh and then you know the buyers that had like this tremendous amount of exposure realized hey it's actually safe for me to buy this this solution. So those are the two kind of counter or you know two examples in this market. I don't know if there's anything you'd highlight from other companies you're working with or things you've seen. >> Yeah I mean those are two great examples.

16:28 Um I'm doing a decent amount of work with a company we invested in called Pylon. Uh they're basically the AI native um customer support and they're a great example of of uh of land grab. They're doing a fantastic job right now of just going out and saying, "Hey, we've got a better way of doing this. Uh, and you know, they have, you know, they've been climbing up the ACV ladder, but you know, they started at pretty modest ACVs, uh, and have been working their way up just by going out and replacing, and they have a

16:55 fantastic go to market team that's just out executing." This this ACV question is actually kind of an interesting one, and I I'd be curious how you thought about it at at Moroi or Samsara. um you know there's there's so much demand out there and there's so many different ways of like kind of building your go to market engine like how much did you actually even think about what you were landing at with these like you know it maybe go back to when you were at like I don't know 10 or 50 of ARR at one of these businesses

17:18 were you optimizing for that or was it just like let's basically figure out how to get enough reps in and >> yeah it's a good question the answer is you think about it a lot and then you try and not think about it at all and what I mean by that is you want to make sure that the ACV that you're going after it. It has to it has to top the hurdle, right?

17:36 Uh in in other words, you look at your unit economics and is it healthy or not? You don't want to be taking deals that are, you know, negative to your unit economics. But if it passes the threshold, then the answer is you don't think about it. You just go and you get as many of those as you can. So, if you can build a go to market engine just theoretically that could live off of 15k ACV deals, yeah, fantastic.

17:56 Like don't take 8K ACV deals, but go get as many 15K AC deals as you can. and you want to just build a repeatable engine and pour fuel on the fire and get as many of those as you can. And then what happens over time is you start inching up, right? Bigger and bigger companies like what you're doing then and and you start stacking up, you know, the wins and going up the ACV ladder.

18:16 >> And and can I one follow up on that because this is interesting. Uh and I'm so much enjoying getting you talking about this stuff, but like Moroi, you guys had um and maybe tell the the audience what Moroi does. Um but you know, basically access points, right, for for internet connectivity. Um and you guys had this really clever program where you would kind of give a an access point away for free is the way I understood it almost but um and then of course like you do that that impacts gross margin but also uh you

18:38 then have a hardware element as a part of your gross margin calculus like >> we don't have as many companies out there that are doing you know maybe AI applications uh with with with a hardware element but there is an inference element which impacts gross margins and so I don't know how did you think about like these kind of trade-offs in the early days of Moroi and and of course you had the same thing at Centara with with hardware too.

18:56 Yeah. So, so just just for for the audience is um edification. So, Moroi was a basically a cloud networking company. Um at this point, 20 years ago, still part of >> still still is a very healthy business within Cisco. Um was acquired by Cisco back in 2012. Um but the the company was actually founded back in 2006. Uh the co-founders were working on a a research project uh as PhD students in MIT uh and started the business.

19:20 And and what's interesting about that, the the research project was called RoofNet. The technology they built was basically largecale like mesh Wi-Fi and they'd install it on the roofs in like Cambridge and the idea was you could you know outfit these municipalities and you know parks and you know public areas with Wi-Fi. Um it was fantastic technology.

19:39 Uh within the first couple years they figured out it wasn't the great business model. There wasn't a lot of revenue in municipal Wi-Fi. And so they made this pivot into enterprise. Um, and the reason I say that is, uh, you know, if if you think about sort of the enterprise networking world in, you know, 2009, 2010, like people thought we were crazy.

19:58 Like, why would you be trying to build an enterprise networking company in 2009? Don't you know that market was won 10 years ago by Cisco and HP? Um but the reality was and again back to sort of the the timing that was right when cloud was coming about and and the the big innovation around Moroi was the the product and engineering folks uh fantastic team there figured out how to configure and manage this networking equipment through the cloud which sounds like yeah total of course back then it was it was a little bit

20:26 innovative. Anyway, um our our problem and that was very much a land grab strategy, right? We had no chance of getting into the largest corporations in the world, Lighthouse, because Cisco and HP had them all tied up. But what we could do is we could say, listen, we can configure, we can deploy faster, we're simpler to use. Well, who cares about that?

20:45 The mid-market, right? Where they don't have substantial IT teams that have been trained in command line code and and this kind of stuff. Um, and so, you know, our kind of firm belief at that point in time was, well, what's the best way to get them to understand that our networking equipment is simpler to use than their Cisco that they're about to buy.

21:05 >> And the answer is get them to try it. >> Yeah. >> And so what we'd do is we'd run these webinars and we'd say, "Hey, you attend the webinar, we'll send you a free access point. >> You plug it in, try it out." And the idea was if they if they try it, the light bulb goes off and they say, "Wow, this is just so much easier than what I'm using." why don't I why don't I use that and it was it was very very successful for a long period of time and um even as the company matured you know we were very very liberal in our

21:28 trial and eval because you just fundamentally want customers to experience the technology >> um and realize that it's better than the alternative >> and do you think like there's there's an element of um that people can kind of learn from that right now it's it's hard though because there is a an aspect of configurability with a lot of the new AI stuff right like if you just give somebody this like you know Ferrari they might not know exactly how to even turn it on and um and so I I I don't know how how you even think

21:58 about like the delivery mechanism for some of these like trial periods PC's with some of the AI companies you're working with right now. >> Yeah. I I think it's become more challenging right in the world of AI because number one things are moving so fast like things are changing daily and if you think about like a a proof of of concept or a trial you know the whole idea if you're on the sales side is I want the customer to experience this.

22:18 I want to prove that it works for them, but I want to do it in a in a period of time that doesn't go on forever, right? And so what you what you have to stay away from, and I think one of the real dangers today is these things turn into like science projects, right? I'm going to deploy this. Well, can it do this? Can it do this? Can you show me this?

22:34 Can you show me this? And of course things are advancing every day. So the answer is probably yes, I could. But then you run the risk of these trials or proof of concepts going on forever. Yeah. And so it just takes a lot of discipline I think in today's day and age to to really box that in and say listen here's what our solution does and we're going to you know define it this way and we're both going to agree that if it you know has done this after 45 days it's success and you're going to move forward with the

22:57 purchase >> and so there's there is a lot of that today >> and did you um well I guess would you recommend having like kind of autocon converts on these as much as you can or yeah like I I don't know like other like kind of learnings and lessons from this type of like 30 45day. Yeah. Um, and then we even talk about like the time the, you know, the right amount of time that you're giving people with the product.

23:18 >> I think I think the timing depends a little bit on the complexity of your product, right? If it's going to take, you know, two weeks to set up, then you can't make it a twoe trial type thing. But, um, I think the two biggest things are make sure you have an end date, right? It's a 30-day trial, it's 45day trial, it's a 60-day trial. Period. End of story.

23:33 And then the second one is you have to define the success criteria up front. Here is what we are proving that we can do for you, >> right? And in some of these companies, uh, you know, you can't do a proof of concept because, you know, maybe it is regulatory, maybe there's, you know, too much risk in there and they're not going to let you do it. But, um, where you can, I think you want to make sure you have both an end date and you have the the success criteria clearly defined.

23:56 Yeah, I think this is so tricky right now where you know so many you know like you have to basically define the scope that you're going after and the success criteria, but oftent times if you're like automating something that has never been automated before, there's like significant amount of configuration and that like costs money and then your product could could work but it might be deployed improperly and and andor the results take longer than 30 or 45 days.

24:22 And so how do you actually kind of there's like a there's like a difference of hey the product is working and you just and and basically you need to work with the customer then optimize whatever they're doing with the product. Y um right like imagine you're uh I mean I I always go back to sales because it's easy to think about sales but like imagine you're you know a sales tool like the product needs to work and then you need to use it and target the right customers for whatever you're you're selling.

24:43 Um and and they're kind of like two different parts of the equation. And so if all of a sudden you're taking risk on for whether or not your product works and then whether or not it's being used correctly very tricky. And so I think this is actually a really important >> topic for founders and for early stage revenue leaders today to figure out how you're educating your customer on like here is the thing we are signing up for.

25:02 We are not signing up for you know you know maybe you are maybe you aren't but um you know whether or not your employees are using our tool the right way. >> Who who have you seen that does the best of evangelizing and and kind of like taking people through the onboarding process? >> You know I think uh who would I put in that bucket? Um I mean I think like DecaGon has done an amazing job um at this like I think they go in they basically evangelize that they're doing customer support better than anyone else.

25:29 Um and then they're very good about saying here are the benchmarks that we are signing up to hit and then they hit them um you know in in their time period right and so I think this is you know I think some people might trivialize you know this it's very hard to do customer support effectively like this is a high-risk exposed market um you know where like you don't want to screw this up and so I think they've done a really good job of of evangelizing um I think the guys at STO back back to like the the example I just

25:56 um I just talked about and then another example would be excuse [clears throat] a company that I'm on the board of called Further Further AI and they they sell into the insurance space and they're kind of they're basically evangelizing the idea of bringing AI to insurance. Um, you know, people have been using AI and insurance like this is not, you know, generally a first adopter of of of technology, but a lot of their customers are some of the biggest insurance companies in the world.

26:18 And it's because they're very comfortable with like okay hey here's like an AI solution that's built in a governant uh you know secure you know governance first you know form and fashion um and then they work with with four deployed teams you know uh their customers to get it up and running. So those are a couple examples. I don't know if you have any >> and and that's that that last one's a good example of like a lighthouse strategy, right?

26:38 They've gone after the bigger insurance companies and you then you get that social proof and >> you know on down the long tale of insurance >> and I and I and I think like sometimes people think that you have to be from a given market to do a lighthouse strategy and maybe there's someone sitting at home and they're like h like if only like I worked at this company I could go do this and it's like no the reality is like go build a relationship.

27:01 >> Yeah. You know, I see you laughing because I know you like go build a relationship with your customer. Go find someone and show them like here's, you know, I have an earned secret. This earned secret is that AI can help your business or technology can help your business in this way. And, you know, work with us on that front. >> I I I'll also say that, you know, every every small company wants to become a big company.

27:18 I don't know too many very large successful companies that at some point in time haven't deployed both strategies. You might start off with land grab but then you mature and you have a lighthouse strategy or you start with lighthouse and then you get big enough that you can go broad you know into land grab. So I think for founders when I get this question early on >> do what makes the most sense for your business right now.

27:39 What does that mean? Go out and talk to customers. Find out where the earliest and easiest sales are and pursue that strategy. It doesn't mean you're completely you know punting on the other one. It just means come back to it. And in in both of the last companies that I worked for, both Moroi and Samsara, we started with land grab. But as soon as we matured and started getting up into enterprise, then what do you do?

28:01 Well, you verticalize and all of a sudden like great, who are the top five, you know, transportation companies? Who are the top five warehousing companies? Who are the top five, you know, public sector? And then you want to go take those down. And so you can morph into a land grab strategy. You just want to do what's most efficient and most effective for the stage of the company you're at.

28:19 talk can you talk a little bit about like one of those like key markets that you unlocked with like you went from land grab early to you know lighthouse in a given market like what did you how did you set up that team um or like was it just you were the founders that was going into this new market and then like you know maybe a little bit about some of those deals that you closed I'm just curious how this played out with the sequencing >> well I I think I you know at at both Moroi and um Samsara you know the the sort

28:46 of earliest example of of um Lighthouse was when we verticalized and in both those instances it was basically into like public sector at Moroi was going after like school districts interesting because that was sort of lowhanging fruit and you know if you're if you anybody anybody's ever sold to school districts like they all talk to each other they all know each other you want to find the biggest school districts in each state and if you can take that down every school district underneath them oh what did that one buy

29:12 great you know all of a sudden the social proof is there >> now why why use a lighthouse strategy Y in say school districts or in Sam Sar's case when we went into public sector when you started selling to cities and counties and states you know why shift because the sales motion is fundamentally different right the sales cycles are different the way you sell the decision makers are different the way they procure is different and so asking the same sales team to shift from you know selling to a mid-market customer an

29:41 enterprise customer over to selling to a city or a county or a school district it's just it's just different and so you know that's a point where you might want to shift and say, "Okay, great. You know, once we're verticalized, we want to shift to a a lighthouse strategy." >> What What would you say there the differences are between great sellers in lighthouse models versus great sellers in landcraft models?

30:00 Are there any differences like from what you saw maybe when you're opening new markets? Is there a profile um that that was most effective? >> It's always difficult to generalize. I I think you know in a true lighthouse strategy and and when I envision lighthouse, it's like, hey, we're going to go after whatever the financial sector. Yeah, >> you know, here are the top 15 accounts in finance and you know, here are their logos.

30:21 Like how many can we get into this quarter, next quarter, next quarter, right? Like that's a lighthouse strategy. >> You know, generally you want more seasoned um you know enterprise sellers that you know know how to work within those accounts. They understand the sales cycles. They understand the the sort of procurement cycles in in more of a land grab strategy where you're just saying, "Hey, we have the best technology.

30:44 We're replacing this workflow. we're replacing this product. You just want, you know, very aggressive like hire for attitude and aptitude, right? You can go earlier in career, you know, you just want those people to get out there and and hit as many of those customers as you can because, you know, at that point, it's like you're hitting a big market and you just want to stack wins as fast as you can.

31:06 >> Yeah. And I I you know my my uh unsolicited advice to any early in career seller uh or potential seller right now is there's never been a better time to work at some of these companies in our portfolio. >> That's absolutely true. It's it's a super fun time to be in the market. Yeah. I I wanted to ask um about maybe a third kind of of selling or or or product diffusion that we that we haven't talked about which is like the developer kind of bottoms up uh like more grassroots adoption and is that is that something

31:37 that you guys are seeing like is is the idea of the seller sort of becoming I wouldn't say obsolete but like for a particular kind of product just just less relevant now like a developer saying to, you know, their CTO or their, you know, CIO or whoever, like, hey, this is great. Like, let's just get this and like there's less of a sales motion needed.

31:59 >> Yeah. You know, um I I guess definitely not like there's a bunch of PLG that's still happening today. I think people are buying things in a consumer fashion all the time and I think that there's new buyer behaviors being, you know, kind of discovered and of course, like, you know, we were big investors in cursor and everyone saw how that played out and there's a bunch of other examples of this.

32:15 Um however like if I take a giant step back and and talk about where we are in this like current cycle like I wrote this long piece called uh trading margin promote about a year year and a half ago or whatever it was. um talking about like the cycle um and if you think about like why you know basically the last 12 years before 2024 or 10 or 15 years before 2024 you saw so much PLG is just kind of where we were in like the software you know innovation cycle you know and a lot of the big cloud platform businesses if you

32:43 think about like CRM HR ITM security like a lot of those big platform businesses were founded in the you know call it 2000 to 2008 2010 period Um, and those businesses went out and solved like the big platform opportunities. And so then the only way to really break in at the enterprise, right? And we're talking more about like enterprise enterprise sales or mid-market enterprise sales was to build like some sort of wedge product, wedge in with this product and say, "Hey, I'm going to solve this part of your of your,

33:12 you know, suite for you and then try to expand over time." And so this like land and expand model became super, you know, obviously super invogue, but it was really based on where we were in this like adoption cycle. And there were other people of course that said, "Hey, I want to go build a new CRM. I want to go build a new HR. I want to go build a new ITSM."

33:29 But like the reality, you know, was going from, you know, onrem to cloud was a big enough shift for people to like switch to something new. But going from like cloud to cloud for CRM, like I don't care if the button is green or blue. I don't care if there's like one little feature difference. I'm not going to switch. And so you can you compare that cycle where we were looking at everything for the last 15 years, which was all PLG and all the time.

33:50 And this is incredible to where we are now. There's this crazy kinetic energy inside of companies where they're saying, "Hey, it could be even something as, you know, fundamental as CRM, right? It could be as fundamental as HR or ITSM. We're now looking at a different way of doing business entirely. This is not a skumorphic onetoone replacement green to blue.

34:10 We're now thinking about like humans are going to be doing something completely different, way more high value. We're going to doing way less of the the same kind of, you know, mundane wrote work. Um, and instead agents are going to be doing doing that. And so that's I think the opportunity right now and it's why instead of talking about like of course we got to talk about PLG and like all these other sales models there's a moment right now to go sell you know big software again right and and and to go sell platforms

34:32 and and it's because of this moment um and so I think people need to be studying kind of the 15 years or go models of like how people build this and and the ecosystems around it um to go and have success. >> Yeah, I think that's right. I I will say I think the consistent trend as long as I've been doing this is that you know every year and with every technology transition buyers become more and more educated.

34:55 Yes. Right. So the buyer today is just fundamentally has a better idea of what they want than they did 5 years ago, 10 years ago, 15 years ago. And so you know that does lend itself more towards, you know, if you can >> hit that buyer when they're in their decision mode, you're going to have a better chance. It doesn't have to necessarily be PLG, but it can be more self- served.

35:14 It can be. It's It should be an easier sell than, you know, 10, 15, 20 years ago where you had to take them on this entire education journey. Why you need this, how it works, here's how you're going to Right. Like they're just so much more educated now on what they want to buy that your job is just to convince them that your company is the right solution for that.

35:31 >> Amen. >> Yeah. Yeah. I guess there the the lighthouse kind of like definition just gets pushed ever outwards or you kind of like Yeah. just have to keep on conquering new territory. I'm curious. I I assume a company just can't stay a lighthouse forever. And you you even alluded to this, Andy, like what what is kind of the average amount of time that a company kind of can just, you know, chew off those those bigger logos and then, you know, like like what is that transition moment like?

36:02 I guess. >> Yeah. I mean, theoretically, you could, right? if if you were a company that was dedicated or committed to a you know multi-product strategy, you could just keep coming out with new products and keep going after you know more verticals, right? Like you could theoretically do that. And I I think there's probably some examples we could come up with of companies that did that.

36:20 But but yeah, in general, you know, if you start with a lighthouse strategy, you've built the social proof, you've gotten these big names, then what you want to do is you want to run the category underneath it, right? If I've gotten the top five financial companies in the world, I want to run down, you know, the list after that. And so that fundamentally becomes a little bit different of a sales motion, right?

36:41 You're spending less time with, you know, the huge organization, the big logo, you know, selling and and you're spending more time, you know, less time on the social proof and more time on, hey, here's a reference if you need it. Otherwise, this is why my product's best buy it. >> Yeah. And I mean I I think and to to Andy's point, there are certain companies I think that actually do just stay lighthouse the entire time.

37:00 And like that would be like I'm trying to think of the best example might be like applied to tuition in our portfolio. Like there's there is a very you know set number of people who are you know buying that kind of autonomous software um and a certain number of you know car manufacturers and so on and so forth in the world. Um, not to say that that's the only people they can sell to, but like of course these are these are trade markets and so you then have to treat every one of these with immense care because they are

37:22 huge um ACP opportunities and and they've obviously I think they're they're arguably the best in the world at doing that. Um, so yeah, that's a good example of that. >> Why why would a founder sort of mis misjudge what game they're playing or how how have you seen founders kind of misjudge whether they're doing lighthouse or lang? I mean, it sounds way more sexy to sell the JP Morgan Chase than to, you know, Morgan [laughter] Chase.

37:48 Like, >> I think I think the biggest mistake that I see founders make at an early stage, honestly, is just spending too much time trying to figure it out, right? Like too much time on the strategy. And strategy is important, but you should spend like 1% of your time on the strategy. Pick it and then spend 99% of your time trying to execute. Yeah. And so, you know, rather than sit back and say, "Well, you know, should we do Lighthouse or should we do land grab, get out, talk to your customers, figure out which ones, you

38:15 know, are are willing to, you know, buy your product, the features and the services that it delivers today, and then chase that path, right? There's no bonus points for hard-earned revenue. You know, you don't get extra, you know, multipliers on your revenue if you get the big logo or something like go after the customers you can, you know, and then, you know, constantly be improving your product.

38:34 And then, you know, you can always reassess your strategy. You after the first year, if you've hit all your your revenue milestones, you can look at it and say, "Well, could we be more effective doing this?" Maybe. But just don't spend too much time in analysis paralysis mode. >> Yeah, totally agree with that. I totally agree with that. >> Joe, you had some you had some fun questions for Andy.

38:51 I was a lightning round question. >> Lightning round. Lightning round. I'll see what other ones I can come up off the top of my head. But um the first one is uh maybe like your favorite place you ever weirdest place you ever closed a deal. You know, I mean we've had some customers that you know have have taken taken us to some some funny places, right?

39:10 I mean I've closed deals on fishing trips. I've closed deals, you know, out at shooting ranges. I've closed deals at ballparks. So yeah, I think those are all, you know, kind of unique like anywhere that wasn't a meeting room. >> Um >> air pair chilis. [laughter] Uh probably probably over probably over the years >> over a couple million >> dollar certainly at Samsara we're selling to you know logistics and and transportation companies you know a lot of trucky yards and and that kind of stuff um you know sanitation

39:35 sites there's some there's some >> when you're doing land grab motions I think this is like the the permeating theme is just like be willing to go and and sell wherever maybe Andy if you could go back and tell yourself one thing when you're building out these these teams or like early in your career what would you tell yourself >> um early career well I I mean, this is the advice I give a lot of uh early in career folks.

39:57 Um, and it was a mistake I made early on. >> The only thing you should really be focused on when you're starting your sales career is find the best company you can possibly find to work for. >> Uh, I made this mistake early in my career. I was chasing, you know, where can I make the most commission, where can I make the most money, what's the hottest technology, what where can I go get the biggest title.

40:17 At the end of the day, none of that matters. What you want to find is you want to find the the great company that's going to grow. And if you do that, then it's like a career elevator, right? Like you will grow with the company. >> But you can't you can't let your ego get in the way and I want a director title or I want this big of a base salary or I think I can get this much of a commission rate.

40:36 Just go find the best company you can work for. Yeah. And go >> fort totally agree. What's one role you think uh companies should hire for earlier than they normally do in the sales work? I mean, it really depends on the company and and how, you know, specifically like how comfortable the founders are, like if you're a founder that's very comfortable with sales and, you know, you can wait longer to hire a sales leader and that kind of stuff.

40:56 Um, so it's a little bit of a generalized question, but I I would say sales operations is is probably one that I see companies waiting a little too long on. And I am not a proponent. I don't think you need to to, you know, stand up a gigantic revenue operations organization. And it can be literally like one person, but you need somebody that every day is thinking through territory alignment, you know, name lists, doing, you know, commission skirmishes, setting a sales constitution, like all that kind of stuff becomes

41:23 really, really, really important because, uh, when you get into like, you know, scale mode, you want all that stuff like largely figured out. You don't want it becomes speed bumps otherwise. So, you want somebody thinking about that and it's it's generally not going to be your sales leader. Yeah. Because they're thinking about how do I hire the next person?

41:37 How do I bring the next deal on? Um, so I'd say yeah, maybe sales operations, sales, revenue operations. >> Yeah. Um, maybe, you know, one sentence or two sentences on, you know, uh, how you think about how what percentage of sales teams at the early stage companies you're at should be hitting quota >> and like kind of [laughter] like, you know, sales comp thinking.

41:57 >> Oh, 100%. >> Yeah, 100%. Well, but I think there's you have some interesting comments on like basically, you know, trying to keep them low, get everyone kind of rabbing and and >> I mean, listen, I think in the early days like sales teams run off of momentum, right? You you want to hire winners and give them a chance to win. So, yes, you want to, you know, be able to bring people in.

42:15 You want to set reasonable goals. Um, it's got to be profitable for the for the company. The unit economics have to work. Like, you can't, you know, you can't change the math. But at the end of the day, like if you're an early stage company and you've got a great product, you want to hire the best possible sales talent to get that product or solution out to market.

42:32 Yes. And the way you do that, the way you attract those people is give them a chance to hit quota. >> Totally. >> So yeah, I think you know some of these companies today where you know 40 50% of the team's hitting quota, I think they're probably doing themselves a disservice. either their quotas are too high or you know their hiring profile is off but um yeah I think especially in the early stages when you know cost of sales isn't as important right when you're a public company and you know you've you've uh you've gone

42:56 out and you've you've conquered your market nobody looks back and says yeah gosh you know six years ago your cost of sales was really terrible yeah [laughter] nobody cares about that what they care about is you know did you get on a path where where you could you know be successful >> well I I think something that's cool about this conversation is just how like timeless.

43:13 A lot of the wisdom is it it just seems it seems like, you know, these frameworks and and ways of thinking about the industry are are pretty consistent just throughout the different software cycles and, you know, eras of that were that we've seen. So anyway, uh Joe, Andy, thank you so much for joining us. Um this was great and excited to have you guys back on. So yeah, got the GOAT. Thanks for having us. Thanks Andy. Fantastic.